"Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion,
nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
The States' Liberty Party will restore to the separate states and to the citizens
their constitutional right to practice their religion free from federal
interference.
Institutionalized values contrary to Religion
The state has unconstitutionally monopolized the
teaching of behavioral morality in the public institutions, namely the assuming
that the procreative act without a desire for a child is natural and good.
Ancient established religions teach a respect for the body and for life, and
of self-control. The contrary-to-religion teaching is injurious to
children and to young adults, resulting in unwanted babies, abortion, break-up
of family, and confusion over sexual orientation, and should not be encouraged.
Public institutions teach lower moral
values than those held by the citizens.
Public institutions, having banned adverse religious teachings, allow no
contrary argument, effectively making immoral behavior the state religion by
ingraining it in educational institutions.
The Constitution placed no religious constraints on the separate states,
restricting clearly and specifically the federal Congress from making law
on or interfering with religion. Subsequently, the anti-slavery Fourteenth
Amendment to the Constitution increased citizens rights, by denying the States
from abridging the "privileges or immunities" of United States citizens, who
held a natural and God given right to freely exercise religion and a federal
right to establish religions in the separate states..
Religion is not and cannot be separated from government
The federal government's duty is to ensure individual religious
freedom
but not interfere with the citizens' right to practice or not practice a religion.
In fact, a congressional law banning religious teachings in the separate states'
educational systems would be a clear violation of the Constitution. How
can the courts require what is forbidden of Congress?
Federal courts are carrying out what Congress cannot do on the authority
that Congress cannot do it.
Citizens petition of grievance will sway the Supreme Court to reverse earlier
flawed decisions that created new law regulating and prohibiting religion
contrary to United States law.
Articles by States' Liberty Party
Has the government denied citizens their
1st and 14th Amendment right to practice the free exercise of religion? Did the
Supreme Court misinterpret the 14th Amendment and misapply the establishment clause by extending a federal
prohibition to the states?
The 1947 federal barring of religion from the
schools stripped citizens of their moral compass, resulting in an
uncontrolled increase in unwanted or terminated babies. single parent
families, and confusion over sexual identity and orientation.
.
Contributed Articles
Few men suspect, perhaps no man
comprehends, the extent of the support given to every virtue. No man perhaps is
aware how much our moral and social sentiments are fed from this fountain.
Links to Other Sites...
The question that has arisen in the
minds of many is this: how did the U. S. Supreme Court arrive at the conclusion
that this Amendment mandated the exclusion of the Bible and prayer from public
schools? More obviously, why did it take from
1791 until 1963 for eight politically-appointed third-rate ambulance chasers to
figure this one out?
